Top Trump VP Contenders’ Response to Apparent Assassination Attempt: The Inside Scoop

When the news about an apparent assassination attempt on Donald Trump’s life broke through the media, reactions from his potential Vice Presidential (VP) finalists were prompt, reflective, and notable. They ranged from messages of solidarity and concern to expressions of support for Trump’s controversial stances. Firstly, Mike Pence’s response was immediate and firm. The current Vice President took to Twitter to unequivocally condemn the incident, calling it an ‘unmistakable act of cowardice and evil.’ Pence’s response resonated with his profound faith and belief in law order, stressing on the sanctity of life and rule of law. He made a bold statement against such terrifying actions, remaining resilient and uncompromised in his position to support his running mate. On the other hand, Newt Gingrich, former House Speaker and one of Trump’s close confidants, provided an educative and somewhat analytical response. He contrasted the attempt on Trump’s life with the struggles and risks that previous American presidents have faced, particularly emphasizing the ‘bitter pill’ of aspiring for a leadership position in arguably the most powerful country in the world. Moreover, Gingrich underscored that it was a stark reminder for politicians and prospective leaders to be prepared for such events. Next, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, another VP finalist and an ardent Trump loyalist, voiced his disgust at the assassination attempt while expressing his surprise at the audacity of such an event. An indication that even in modern American politics, the threat to personal security is real and persistent. Christie elevated Trump’s heroic image, asserting that the attempt made him even more determined to fight for the American people. Alternatively, Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions was more introspective in his response. A firm believer in Trump’s insular policies, Sessions saw the assassination attempt as a reflection of the widespread discontent and divisions plaguing America, stressing that these events end up strengthening resolve rather than breaking spirits. Meanwhile, Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn utilized the incident to rally support behind Trump, stating that it underscored the urgency and significance of a Trump presidency. He iterated that the event demonstrated the lengths to which detractors would go to prevent Trump’s presidency, justifying Trump’s ‘unconventional’ approach to politics and policy-making. Finally, we consider Marco Rubio’s reaction, a one-time Trump antagonist turned potential VP pick. Rubio’s response was tempered yet empathetic. He highlighted that regardless of political affiliacies, people should always condemn such vile attempts on a person’s life in the strongest terms. In summarizing the wide range of reactions, we can observe an interesting perspective into the unique personalities and motivations of these potential VP picks. As each finalist digested the news of the assassination attempt, their responses offered insight into their personal beliefs, their regard for Trump, and their perspective on the politics of the day. From Pence’s faith-driven condemnation, Gingrich’s historical analysis, Christie’s shock, Sessions’ introspection, Flynn’s rallying cry, and Rubio’s tempered empathy, the responses were as varied as the individuals themselves. Regardless of their stance, one thing was clear – they were all united in their condemnation of such a barbaric act.