“Supreme Court Urged to Halt Restrictions on White House Social Media Requests

The Supreme Court was recently asked to pause new limits set in place by the No-Fly List for White House social media requests. This major request, have sent shockwaves through the legal system, as there have been concerns over how the archives will remain secure and regulated. The Supreme Court has yet to decide how to rule on this contentious issue, however, they have agreed to consider the request in order to decide whether or not the No-Fly List should stay in place. This move is being seen as a step in the right direction as it will allow the court to investigate the matter and decide whether the security of government documents is more important than the freedom of the public. Opponents of the ban argue that the No-Fly List restricts individuals’ rights by forcing them to apply for special permission before they can gain access to White House documents. On the other hand, proponents of the No-Fly List insist that it is necessary in order to ensure the safety of White House documents. They point to a recent cyber attack on the government that occurred earlier this year and worry that further attacks may be successful if the ban is lifted. While the matter is being considered, the White House has made its stance known. In a statement issued soon after the Supreme Court’s request, the White House stated that it will continue to be committed to protecting the confidentiality of government documents and that the ban should remain in place until a ruling is made. As the debate continues, the Supreme Court will be the ultimate judge as to whether or not the No-Fly List should stay or go. This decision could prove to be a major turning point in the future of how government documents are accessed. No matter what the outcome, the public will be waiting for a conclusion in order to determine whether or not their rights will be affected.